Forgot Password?

Mac Users: Datamyne requires adjustments
to your browser's security settings.

View instructions HERE

Minimum system reqs for Datamyne 3.0:

IE 11 or higher, and current versions of Chrome, Firefox, and Safari are fully supported. Your browser must have JavaScript enabled. Please clear your cache if upgrading from 2.1. You may need to adjust security settings to enable Excel downloading.

If you are having trouble logging in, please

Call 833.262.2315

Datamyne Resource Center

Covering trade & transport, with tips on using import-export data to advantage

Food Supply Chains: Secure Enough?

The FDA mandates registration of imported food facilities

By Peter Quinter, guest columnist

On December 12, 2003, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) implemented the Bioterrorism Act of 2002. That Act basically required that companies shipping food to the U.S. must first be registered with the FDA, and that importers of food must provide “prior notice” to the FDA of any particular shipment before it physically arrives in the U.S.  Over the past seven years, has the Bioterrorism Act lived up to its expectations to protect the American consumer from eating dangerously contaminated food?

In an article entitled Scrap the Bioterrorism Act published in February 2004, I criticized the Act as not going far enough because it did not require (1) FDA inspectors to be located in foreign countries sending us food, (2) cooperation with foreign food inspection governmental authorities, and (3) mandatory recall authority to the FDA for contaminated foods. A May 6, 2010, report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), Food Safety: FDA Could Strengthen Oversight of Imported Food, comes to exactly the same conclusions.

As stated in the GAO report, the FDA physically examines approximately 1% of imported food.

Imported fish and other seafood are of particular interest to the FDA. Obviously, FDA inspectors cannot physically inspect every shipment of imported seafood, but every shipment that contains FDA-regulated products that enters the U.S. is electronically reviewed by the FDA to determine if the shipment should be physically examined or a sample laboratory tested. Hence, the prior notice information enables the FDA, working closely with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, to more effectively target inspections at the border to ensure the safety of imported foods before the food enters the commerce of the U.S.

Registration of food facilities that manufacture, process, pack, or hold food is supposed to help provide FDA with information on the origin and distribution of food. The objective is that the registration will aid in the detection and quick response to actual or potential threats to the U.S. food supply, usually by microbiological contamination such as listeria.

If an importer is attempting to import food from a foreign facility which has not been registered with the FDA, the food will be held at the port of arrival until the registration violation is corrected. Registration by the foreign food producer and shipper may be easily accomplished, in multiple languages, at

My conclusion is that the FDA is doing a much better job at protecting the international food supply chain, but it needs the U.S. Congress to now pass the Food Safety bill, pending there for over a year, to really do an effective job. Coincidentally, the Sunday New York Times front page article Senate Bill on Food Safety is Stalled makes the same argument.

Copyright © 2010, Becker & Poliakoff

10 May 2012: Peter Quinter is now a Shareholder in the law firm of GrayRobinson and Chair of the firm’s Customs & International Trade Law Group. Based in the firm’s Miami and Ft. Lauderdale offices, Quinter principally represents persons and companies involved in international trade and transport. Editor of the GrayRobinson Customs and International Law Blog, Quinter is widely recognized for his expertise in international and trade law.

You can contact Peter Quinter at [email protected] or at (954) 270-1864.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of its author and do not purport to reflect the opinions or views or Descartes Datamyne. In addition, this article is for general information purposes only and it’s not intended to provide legal advice or opinions of any kind and my not be used for professional or commercial purposes. No one should act, or refrain from acting, based solely on this article without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice.

Date posted: September 24, 2010


Comments are closed